1-A, 2-B, 3-B, 4-C, 5-B, 6-A,
7-A, 8-B, 9-D, 10-C,
11-D, 12-C, 13-C, 14-C, 15-B, 16-C,
17-A, 18-C, 19-B, 20-B, 21-A/D*,
22-C, 23-C, 24-A, 25-C,
26-B, 27-C, 28-D, 29-D, 30-B, 31-D, 32-B,
(repeated: 33-B, 34-D, 35-B) 36-C, 37-A,
38-A, 39-B, 40-D, 41-A, 42-C, 43-D, 44-A,
45-C, 46-B, 47-A, 48-B, 49-E, 50-B,
51-A, 52-B, 53-C, 54-C, 55-E.
comment on 21: The demand for milk will certainly increase, driving up the price and quantity. The effect on the supply side could be debatable. In microeconomic analysis of a firm supply of a good, it is discovered that the supply decision is based only on marginal cost. Here you are told there is a costly advertising campaign. Does the cost of an advertising campaign vary with the level of output or is it a "fixed" or "one time" cost? If this is (and arguably could be) more like a fixed cost, the supply decisions would not change (and supply would not move) and the answer would be A. However, if you argue that the supply would decrease then unambiguously price will rise but the combined effect of decrease in supply and increase in demand would leave us uncertain about equilibrium quantity. This is a tough argument and if appeared on a test, I would accept both. But I hope to avoid such unclear problems on a test. (Sorry.)
Let me know if you think there are any errors. I may be online briefly tonight, but I'm feeling like I need to be in bed early. I'll try to be on AIM in the morning or during office hours if you have any questions.
Good Luck